Dent honorary captain; Harris: I'm playing

276983.jpg

Dent honorary captain; Harris: I'm playing

Friday, Jan. 21, 2011
Posted: 12:47 p.m. Updated: 5:08 p.m.
By John Mullin
CSNChicago.com

Former Chicago Bears defensive end Richard Dent, the team's all-time sack leader, MVP of Super Bowl XX and Pro Football Hall of Fame Class of 2011 finalist, will serve as the team's honorary captain for Sunday's NFC Championship at Soldier Field.

In two stints spanning 12 years with the Bears, Dent recorded a franchise record 124.5 sacks. He recorded a Chicago single-season record and career-high 17.5 sacks in 1984. Dent totaled eight double-digit sack seasons as a Bear while leading the team in sacks eight times.

Dent played professional football for a total of 15 years, also earning a Super Bowl ring with San Francisco in 1994, finishing with 137.5 career sacks, tied for sixth all-time in the NFL.

Im playing

He may not be taking all the practice reps yet but safety Chris Harris was firm Friday: He is playing against the Green Bay Packers Sunday.

Harris hip pointer kept him out of practice Wednesday and Thursday but I feel a lot better than I did previous days, Harris said after practice Friday. Im playing. Im definitely playing.

A hip pointer can be painful and coaches may face a decision on whether he at his current level or Craig Steltz, on the inactive list seven games this season, makes more sense against a Green Bay offense that averages 24.3 points per game (10th in the NFL).

The Bears defense, whether in Cover-2 mode or other, requires strong safety play and decision-making and Harris is not going to create a problem just so he can be on the field.

If it happens to bother me, I will definitely come out of the game, Harris said.

Love the matchup classic vs. classic

Lovie Smith has had to defend (well, not really defend) his Cover-2 defensive scheme from critics who havent always had a real grasp of what he and coordinator Rod Marinelli actually do run and when.

The unit has been a top-10 defense in myriad areas in multiple years and with different personnel. Which makes you wonder Does Mike McCarthy up in Green Bay have to keep defending use of the West Coast offense?

Obvious answer: no. The reality is that the reason the West Coast system has worked well and for a long, long time by NFL standards is because it has been adapted by its various practitioners. Just as Smith has created his own version of the defense he learned under Tony Dungy.

You do have to love this matchup within the matchup: West Coast system vs. Cover-2.

For the record, the Bears handled Andy Reids version of the West Coast in their win over the Philadelphia Eagles. They allowed no more than 17 points in the Green Bay games (17 and 10) and Mike Shanahans Washington version only put up 17 and that was with one of DeAngelo Halls four interceptions going 92 yards the other way for 7 points.

Matt Hasselbeck is pure West Coast from his years with Mike Holmgren in Green Bay and Seattle. The Seahawks nicked the Bears in their regular-season meeting with help from the old Mike Martz offense calling 47 pass plays, 12 runs and controlling the ball less than 26 minutes.

Well throw out the divisional game just because of the injury to tight end John Carlson, a big part of Hasselbecks West Coast base. But the Seahawks did only total 96 yards and zero points in the first half before the Bears took their feet off the gas defensively.

Sometimes ya gotta love the classics.

James who?

Green Bay lost its running game opening day when tailback Ryan Grant was lost to an ankle injury for the year. It seemed to get it back when James Starks came of the physically unable to perform list, got in several late-season games, including one against the Bears, and then stunned the Philadelphia Eagles with 123 yards on 23 carries in the wild-card game.

The Bears rank 2nd in the NFL in rushing defense, allowing 90 yards per game. The Giants Ahmad Bradshaw (129) and Washingtons Ryan Torain (125) have been the only backs to gain 100 yards on the Bears this season and they dont exactly expect Starks to become the third.

As far as what makes Starks tough to bring down, linebacker Brian Urlacher wasnt sure the question even pertained to the Bears.

Tough, for other teams? Urlacher said. The point isnt Starks; its the Bears. We run to the football. Thats what we do really well. We get a lot of guys to the football. We havent missed a lot of tackles this year, but when we do we have guys running to the football to get him down so well keep doing that.

Distant rivalry

The Bear-Packer rivalry is certainly a competition of long standing. But it rarely has extended into the postseason.

Not only is this just the second time the two teams have faced each other in the playoffs. It also is only the fourth time the two teams have even been in the playoffs in the same year. Its difficult to have a true rivalry when one side of the situation is good and the other is bad, which was the case for too many seasons.

Besides the 1941 one-game playoff to decide the Western Conference, both reached the 1994 playoffs as wild cards. Both won in that round but lost big to other opponents in the divisional round.

The Bears won the division in 2001, Green Bay qualified and won a round as a wild card, but both lost big again in the divisional round.

This year, things were different.

Rivalry perspective

For many Bears the single most important aspect of Sundays game is not that its against Green Bay. Its that the game is the final step to the Super Bowl.

Same in Green Bay. As far as added significance to the game, For me personally, not really, said linebacker Clay Matthews. Obviously you want to beat them with everything that goes on between Chicago and Green Bay and the historic organizations that we both have.

I think the fans, Chicago would like to beat Green Bay that much more and Green Bay to Chicago, so like Urlacher said, its an NFC Championship game. You have to understand that no matter who youre playing, you better bring youre A-game because youre one game away from making the Super Bowl. You need to show up, and you wouldnt be in the position you are if you hadnt been.

John "Moon" Mullin is CSNChicago.com's Bears Insider, and appears regularly on Bears Postgame Live and Chicago Tribune Live. Follow Moon on Twitter for up-to-the-minute Bears information.

Bears' benching of rookie Jonathan Bullard a surprise message from coaching staff

Bears' benching of rookie Jonathan Bullard a surprise message from coaching staff

Whether it will prove to be a wakeup shot for an underachieving rookie or not, the announcement that rookie defensive end Jonathan Bullard was inactive for Sunday’s game against the San Francisco 49ers is noteworthy for multiple reasons.

The deactivation was surprising if only because so many of Ryan Pace’s draft choices have been getting on the field and doing reasonably well. Telling Bullard to take a seat was a statement by coach John Fox, coordinator Vic Fangio and line coach Jay Rodgers, all of whom were involved in evaluations leading to the Bears using a third-round pick on the defensive lineman, that this staff is not going to simply and stubbornly stick with a player because they picked him.

Bullard was the only one of the Bears’ top seven picks in the 2016 draft, other than injured cornerback Deiondre Hall, who did not start against the 49ers.

Bullard, expected to challenge for a starting at one D-line position because of his pass-rush potential, did get one start (against Tampa Bay) but played just 14 snaps against Tennessee and was credited with just one (assisted) tackle. Bullard has one sack and two quarterback pressures in 212 snaps played. The sack came at Indianapolis. In the six games since then ... crickets.

Playing time is the ultimate cudgel coaches have this side of the transaction wire. Not saying that Bullard comes under this umbrella, but he would not be the first NFL player who treated their high draft selection as having achieved something when it actually was the beginning, not the finish.

But while coach John Fox cited “ability” first as the reason for Bullard being deactivated, a lack of motivation appeared to be involved based on Fox’s subsequent explanation.

“I think there's a variety of ways to motivate young people,” Fox said. “He's a player that we do like, that we're trying to bring the best out of like we do all our players. He gets to practice all week just like the other players, then how they perform in practice sometimes is reflective on what kind of opportunities they get in the game, so they have to earn it.”

[SHOP BEARS: Get your Bears gear right here]

This approach has worked. Many drafts ago, the Bears used the No. 5 pick of the 1998 draft on running back Curtis Enis, who held out for most of training camp before signing following one of the more bizarre negotiating processes ever. Enis arrived in camp but had decided that he was a runner and didn’t see himself as a blocker, even though no one less than center Olin Kreutz, who knows something about blocking, would later say that Enis was far and away the greatest blocker at running back that Kreutz had ever seen.

Joe Brodsky, the crusty old running backs coach under Dave Wannstedt, had zero tolerance for Enis’ attitude, which included insulting at least one assistant coach. Brodsky privately got squarely in the face of the rookie and informed him that until he made protecting his quarterback as important as running the football, Enis would not start for the Bears.

Enis watched Edgar Bennett start until Brodsky’s message sank in, which was midseason. Enis finally started — one game, against the Rams — and was having the best game of his season when he unfortunately tore his left ACL and his career was all but finished.

But it took tough love from a coaching staff that needed him for its survival (which subsequently did not happen, losing six of the next seven games and costing Wannstedt and staff their jobs) to get through to Enis.

Bullard is not Enis, but the organization invested a Day 2 draft pick in him to be more than fill for the depth chart. Now the burden falls to Bullard to demonstrate that he got the message.

“It's like anybody, from adversity they respond, and that was one of the things I was impressed with our team (Sunday),” Fox said. “Things didn't go well early in the game, defense got put in a couple tough spots because of some special-teams errors and then how we responded as a team, so I would expect the same from any individual player, whether it's due to injury or maybe coaches' decision.

“We want guys to prove us wrong.”

Recalling Bears RB Rashaan Salaam: a gentle young man, now dead at age 42

rashaansalaamheisman.jpg
AP

Recalling Bears RB Rashaan Salaam: a gentle young man, now dead at age 42

The thing that stood out about Rashaan Salaam to this reporter was the genuine humility that once prompted him to ask, “Why do you want to talk to me? I haven’t done anything yet. You should talk to these guys,” gesturing down the locker-room way toward some of his offensive linemen.

So on Tuesday when the news hit that Salaam had been found dead of undetermined causes in a Boulder, Colo., park at age 42, the first thought, after abject disbelief, was what kind of young man the Bears’ 1995 first-round draft choice was. And your mind goes back to Andy Heck, one of those offensive linemen, saying after Salaam had suffered a knee injury in a game at Cincinnati, that “Rashaan didn’t say anything, just was there in the huddle, his leg actually shaking from what must have been the pain.”

Salaam had won the 1994 Heisman Trophy as a running back topping 2,000 rushing yards with Kordell Stewart and the Colorado Buffaloes. "He was very coachable," former Colorado coach Bill McCartney said, via the school's website. "He had a happy heart. I loved being around him. He didn't take himself too seriously, and he always credited those around him, especially his offensive line. What I liked about him is that he had a sparkle in his eye. He was upbeat and positive."

Bears then-personnel chief Rod Graves made Salaam the 21st pick of the 1995 first round, and Salaam proceeded to then have one of the great rookie seasons in Bears history – 1,074 rushing yards (then a Bears rookie record, since eclipsed by Matt Forte and Anthony Thomas), and 10 touchdowns (exceeded only by Gale Sayers). Salaam was named NFC offensive rookie of the year.

But his year was marked by 10 fumbles (or nine, depending on the source), which became the lasting recollection of a season in which Salaam, Erik Kramer, Curtis Conway and Jeff Graham set franchise records for offense but missed the playoffs.

Salaam never completely shook free of the knee issues, giving way to Raymont Harris over the next two seasons before he left as a free agent (he had signed just a three-year rookie deal, gambling on reaching free agency sooner) after rushing for just 608 yards combined for 1996-97. After stops with Green Bay and Cleveland in 1999, Salaam played briefly in Canada and finished his football with the Toronto Argonauts in 2004.

He managed is money and was comfortable in retirement. But he confided to former colleague Fred Mitchell of the Chicago Tribune several years ago that his partying and use of marijuana contributed to his downfall as a player. "I had no discipline,” Salaam said. “I had all the talent in the world. You know, great body, great genes. But I had no work ethic and I had no discipline. The better you get, the harder you have to work. The better I got, the lazier I got."

Salaam told Pro Football Weekly a couple of years ago that he remained a Bears fan. "It's always great sitting down every Sunday to watch the Bears play," Salaam said.

"Legendary organization, gave me my chance 19 years ago, so they'll always be very dear to my heart."