Hillenmeyer: NFL lockout different than NHL's

428785.jpg

Hillenmeyer: NFL lockout different than NHL's

Monday, March 28, 2011
Posted: 2:30 p.m.

By John Mullin
CSNChicago.com

The Bears released Hunter Hillenmeyer early this offseason but that doesnt mean that the veteran linebacker and players rep is without perspectives on the current situation involving his sport.

Hillenmeyer, writing on NBCChicago.com's Grizzly Detail blog, draws parallels (and differences) between the lockout of the NFL and the one imposed by the National Hockey League, beginning with the fact that both involved outside counsel union breaker Bob Batterman.

Hmmm.

Both lockouts followed moves to de-certify the player unions, and the NHL players was upheld. Hunter brings in his personal perspectives, formed while he was actively involved in the final days of talks and was witness to the proposals put forward by the players group.

A noteworthy difference between the NFL and NHL situations lies in the fact that hockey owners were hemorrhaging cash during negotiations, something clearly not the case in footballs situation. And Hillenmeyer reiterates that NFL players are willing to accept less than the percentage of revenues than hockey players wanted, and that NFL players will be content with staying with the same deal, under which all sides were making money.

Not to take a side, but its tough to argue with that fact. Not many labor groups have been willing to accept status quo in negotiations, and it may be difficult to see a judge in this case ignoring that fact when the Apr. 6 case comes up for adjudication.

Medically speaking

One of the ticking issues in the owner-player situation is former players and their health benefits. A representative of the NFL players is reporting that a Federal judge has issued an injunction requiring all teams and owners to stop seeking to reduce the worker comp benefits due former players for injuries suffered while playing the game.

And as for current players, colleague Tom Curran at CSNNE.com has established with the NFL that players may in fact see team doctors during the lockout, as long as it is not at team facilities. That follows Tom seeing a story in the Boston Globe in which a team physician alluded to one of the Patriots showing up at his office.

Even the players themselves were off on this one, as the website of the former union laid out as one of the lockout terms that players couldnt see medical staff. For the likes of Jay Cutler and his knee, this is good news, for both player and team.

John "Moon" Mullin is CSNChicago.com's Bears Insider, and appears regularly on Bears Postgame Live and Chicago Tribune Live. Follow Moon on Twitter for up-to-the-minute Bears information.

Bears adding Mark Sanchez shouldn't come as a surprise

Bears adding Mark Sanchez shouldn't come as a surprise

The Bears went into the 2017 offseason with a clear plan to make changes, presumably positive ones, at the quarterback position. The idea was and always is to improve the quality of players at this or any position.
 
With the Bears agreeing to terms with former Jet/Eagle/Bronco/Cowboy Mark Sanchez, as first reported by NFL.com's Ian Rapaport, GM Ryan Pace and the organization are addressing the quantity aspect of the position, if not necessarily the quality. And that should not be dismissed.
 
Sanchez fits the template of a Brian Griese, Jason Campbell and even Josh McCown, veterans with less than auspicious resumes' but with more a David Fales or Caleb Hanie had brought to previous rosters. He gives the Bears a third quarterback under contract; expect another to be added before training camp, most likely through the draft next month.

[VIVID SEATS: Get your Bears tickets right here!]
 
It really does not matter that Sanchez, the No. 5 overall pick of the 2009 draft, could not beat out Trevor Siemian in Denver two years ago or Dak Prescott in Dallas last season (while Prescott was still an unknown backup to Tony Romo). The Bears before Thursday had just Mike Glennon and Connor Shaw under contract, and teams typically go into training camps with four passers, if for no other reason than to have arms to spread drill work around.
 
But Sanchez, whose career began with trips to the AFC Championship game his first two seasons in the NFL, represents the kind of backup that teams crave, irrespective of any journeyman status they might have. Sanchez is 30, whose teams have gone 37-35 in his starts, and has experienced winning, albeit less and less as his career has played out.
 
Not that the comparison is particularly notable, but Mark Sanchez or Matt Barkley? If Sanchez somehow surprises perhaps even himself and challenges Glennon, the Bears and Glennon are the better for it.

Would the Bears consider selecting Notre Dame QB DeShone Kizer?

Would the Bears consider selecting Notre Dame QB DeShone Kizer?

Would the Bears consider selecting DeShone Kizer with the No. 3 pick in the upcoming draft?

At what point in the draft should they consider taking a signal caller?

Does it make sense for Ryan Pace and the Bears to take at least one quarterback in every draft?

We answer those questions in the video above in the latest SportsTalk Live segment.