Miller: Bears facing an identity crisis

318027.jpg

Miller: Bears facing an identity crisis

Friday, Sept. 23, 2011
Posted: 8:25 p.m.

By Jim Miller
CSNChicago.com

The Bears have some serious offensive issues tocorrect heading into this weekends divisional matchup against the Green BayPackers. An offensive identity is the biggest concern. By Week 3 in theNFL, you normally know who you are and who you want to be offensively. Shockingly, in year two of Mike Martzssystem, the Bears again cannot identify who they are and are pretending to besomething they are not. If the Bears want to reign victorious; they must run thefootball, protect QB Jay Cutler, have offensive line cohesion and wide receivers must make plays. Bear Down Bear fans because its not lookinggood.You would have thought Mike Martz would have taken theblueprint from last year and built from it! After the bye week last year, the Bears found their identity in Week 8 through a run game that brought balance and preserved Cutlerfrom purchasing a headstone and early burial at Soldier Field. Unfortunately, every Sunday seemed like Cincode Mayo for opposing defenses to enjoy an afternoon Siesta with Jay posing asthe Piata. Only Mike Martz can explain his fascination throwing thefootball every down, but Lovie has stated very clearly what the Bears'blueprint for success needs to be. There must be balance. Yes, Cutlers talents are numerous andcertainly need to be featured in some games, but with solid defense and goodspecial teams the Bears would finish the season 8-8 with those two componentsalone. Why Martz continues to battlethis mission statement is not good for the team and quite frankly, its notgood for Cutlers career.

Sadly, this weekends game is one where Jay needs to throwthe football. Green Bays secondary has been lit up forover 400 yards in consecutive outings and needs to be tested again, but Martzhas lost this option. The plethora ofblitzes DC Dom Capers likes to run have not been executed well and left themvulnerable to big plays it's essentially designed to stop.The 3-4 Blitz Zone is normally a well choreographed defense,but I believe, it has been affected by the lockout. The same defense run by thePittsburgh Steelers had the same issues losing to Baltimore in Week 1. It's an assignment drivendefense where each non- blitzer drops to a certain spot in coverage. The reason it's called a Blitz Zone defenseis because you are calling zone coverage where a defensive player is in placeto defend deep even though you are Blitzing!
Blitzes normally coincide with man to man coverage, which is why theBlitz Zone has been all the rage and why 26 of 32 NFL teams now use someversion of it. The scheme is actually very conservative but it does have an array ofdifferent looks and blitzes, which can be confusing to any OL. Both the Steelers and Packers are ultimately running the same scheme, which is: Blitz Zone cover 3 or Blitz Zone cover 2 amajority of the time. After witnessing the Bears offensive line incorrectly pointout their pass protection assignments versus the Saints last week, this willhave to be a very simple game plan for the Bears, who now have injuries to deal with on their offensive frontline. Gabe Carimi might be a rookie, but at least he knew his assignment andnow he's out. The Bears' offense canonly handle base runs, base pass protections and if they fall behind and haveto throw, they should just put it on Jay by calling a 5 man pass pro. Let Jay worry about the blitzes to:1. Throw the ball away to protect himself.
2. Throw hot to Wrs, who need to expose a GB secondary out of position.

3. Scramble for yardage (Dom Capers and Dick LeBeau hated mobile QB's, given Cam Newtons big day. Jay is capable)

I also hope Jay uses the snap count to his advantage to getclues from the Green Baydefense. A lot of double cadence andquick count needs to be called in the huddle by Jay for nothing more than whatmight become self preservation.

Jim Miller, an 11-year former NFL quarterback, is a Comcast SportsNet Bears analyst who can be seen each week on U.S. Cellular Bears Postgame Live. Miller, who spent five seasons with the Bears, analyzes current Chicago QB Jay Cutler in his "15 on 6" blog on CSNChicago.com and can be followed on Twitter @15miller.

Want to be in on Bears QB deliberations? 'Look at the film'

Want to be in on Bears QB deliberations? 'Look at the film'

Back in 1992 the Dallas Cowboys were in draft deliberations around the No. 17 spot of the first round, looking for upgrades on defense. A scout made a suggestion that they target Ohio State defensive end Alonzo Spellman, one of the most physically imposing (6-4, 280 pounds) players and best athletes in that draft.
 
Coach Jimmy Johnson responded, "Tell me about the production."
 
Came back the answer: Three years at OSU, nine total sacks.
 
"Oh, please!" Johnson scoffed, calling in cornerback Kevin Smith and leaving Spellman to the Bears at No. 22. Spellman had several respectable seasons but never more than 8.5 sacks in nine NFL seasons.
 
As investment advisers counsel, past performance is not necessarily a predictor of future results. But past performance can be, and an axiom in NFL personnel rooms is, look at the film.
 
CSNChicago.com is doing that as the NFL Scouting Combine approaches (Feb. 29) along with free agency and the start of the league year and its trading window. It becomes an increasingly relevant exercise to look at the intricacies behind some of the key players and positions the Bears will be addressing through the upcoming weeks. CSNChicago.com previously looked at the need to evaluate quarterbacks from the intangible standpoints first, then the measurables.
 
Using Jay Cutler as an object lesson for how immense physical skills have questionable correlations to immense NFL performance, a look at one aspect of quarterback "film" warrants more attention than the measurables that command a disproportionate share of attention and scrutiny.
 
Ball security.
 
It has been Cutler's single biggest issue through his eight Bears seasons, was a reason why coaches once wanted to stay with Josh McCown instead of returning to Cutler following a Cutler injury absence, and why Brian Hoyer played his way into prominence in the discussion of 2017 Bears plans. Adam Gase went from offensive coordinator to hottest head-coach prospect in no small measure because he managed Cutler into better ball security.

[SHOP: Get your Bears gear right here]
 
But the point here is less Cutler – expected to be traded or released within the near future – than the level of ball security in the available options beyond Hoyer.
 
So, look at the film:
 
The widespread drooling over a possible trade with New England for Jimmy Garoppolo. The best thing in Garoppolo's favor is that he has been a Patriots backup to Tom Brady. Garoppolo, drawing distant comparisons to a Matt Flynn, Matt Cassel and other past experience-lite quarterback options, has thrown 94 NFL passes without an interception, which is impressive until matched against Hoyer's 200 last season without an interception, for comparison purposes.
 
But evaluating Garoppolo against the coming chief draft competition – DeShone Kizer, Mitch Trubisky, Deshaun Watson – suggests comparing apples to apples, meaning college ball security, since that's all the kids have to this point.
 
Garoppolo vaulted up draft boards (to New England's second round) on the strength of an Eastern Illinois senior season with 53 touchdown passes vs. nine interceptions, against chiefly FCS opposition. But in his first three seasons Garoppolo threw for 65 touchdowns and was intercepted 42 times.
 
Kizer? In his two Notre Dame seasons, 47 touchdowns, 19 interceptions.
 
Trubisky? 30 touchdowns last season, six interceptions. Including his two years as a North Carolina backup, 41 touchdowns, 10 interceptions.
 
Watson? 90 touchdowns, 32 interceptions in three Clemson seasons, the last two as Tigers starter.
 
Observations:
 
Garoppolo put in four college seasons, but has a little of the Trubisky/Flynn/Cassel, one-year-wonder feel. 
 
Kizer and Watson have more starting seasons, but the Watson intangible of getting his team to two national-championship games speaks to another level of "intangible."
 
GM Ryan Pace will incorporate heavy input from coach John Fox and coordinator Dowell Loggains. Coaches love ball security. Garoppolo? Watson? Trubisky? Kizer?
 
Look at the film.

BearsTalk Podcast: The risk and reward for Bears in trading for Jimmy Garoppolo

jimmy-g-216.jpg
USA TODAY

BearsTalk Podcast: The risk and reward for Bears in trading for Jimmy Garoppolo

In this edition of the BearsTalk podcast, CSN's Chris Boden, Sun-Times Bears beat writer Patrick Finley, and CSNChicago.com's Scott Krinch discuss the Bears' approach to the two-week window opening to franchise-tag Alshon Jeffery again, the risk/reward in trading for Jimmy Garoppolo or drafting a QB (and how high to draft one), Scott's 2.0 mock draft, plus the workers' compensation controversy the team found itself in last week and the club's decision to raise ticket prices.

Listen to the full episode at this link or in the embedded player below: