Mullin: Will Bears file protest over field conditions?

341864.jpg

Mullin: Will Bears file protest over field conditions?

Thursday, Dec. 16, 2010
11:00 AM

By John Mullin
CSNChicago.com

The talk with Mac and Spiegs on WSCR-AM 670s The Danny Mac Show was whats still on a lot of minds a lot of places: where the Bears-Minnesota Vikings will in fact play Monday.

Vikings coach and former Bear Leslie Frazier told Larry Mayer of ChicagoBears.com and me that the thinking is 80-90 percent sure that itll be at the University of Minnesotas TCF Bank Stadium, which is head-shaking on so many levels. The franchise wants to give its fans a home game, yet temps that night are predicted in single digits, which speaks more to wanting max revenue from a home game rather than fan comfort.

The guys had just seen a tweet from Jeff Zulgad on the Minneapolis Star-Tribunes Access Vikings that the Bears may file a protest over field conditions, which are indeed a factor given the frozen state of the state up there.

One venue that we batted around, not for this game but maybe someday, is the prospect of NFL football again in Los Angeles and could the Vikings move there as a couple groups are trying to make happen. The Los Angeles Vikings isnt a team name; its an oxymoron, like Utah Jazz (another team that moved but didnt change its last name). Utah and Jazz dont compute, and neither do L.A. and Vikings. Well see.

Mac cut to a Bears issue, though, that wont go away and thats the need for the offensive line to take another next-step vs. the Vikings, wherever they play. The Bears needed to run the ball against New England and 47 yards on 14 carries is not good enough for a team that expects to play more than 16 games.

The guys also noted that the combined point production from the four NFC North teams last weekend was 20: seven each by the Bears and Lions, three each by the Packers and Vikings.

I threw out that going almost unnoticed under all the talk of Bears clinching next weekend is that the Packers are teetering precipitously close to missing the playoffs entirely. A loss in New England would be six for the team many picked to be playing in the Super Bowl. Right now either Atlanta or New Orleans, winners of seven and six straight, respectively, is getting one wild card. And Philadelphia and the Giants have four losses right now. Those two play each other this weekend but the Giants go to Green Bay yet this season and that could matter a lot for the Packers chances.

John "Moon" Mullin is CSNChicago.com's Bears Insider, and appears regularly on Bears Postgame Live and Chicago Tribune Live. Follow Moon on Twitter for up-to-the-minute Bears information.

Want to be in on Bears QB deliberations? 'Look at the film'

Want to be in on Bears QB deliberations? 'Look at the film'

Back in 1992 the Dallas Cowboys were in draft deliberations around the No. 17 spot of the first round, looking for upgrades on defense. A scout made a suggestion that they target Ohio State defensive end Alonzo Spellman, one of the most physically imposing (6-4, 280 pounds) players and best athletes in that draft.
 
Coach Jimmy Johnson responded, "Tell me about the production."
 
Came back the answer: Three years at OSU, nine total sacks.
 
"Oh, please!" Johnson scoffed, calling in cornerback Kevin Smith and leaving Spellman to the Bears at No. 22. Spellman had several respectable seasons but never more than 8.5 sacks in nine NFL seasons.
 
As investment advisers counsel, past performance is not necessarily a predictor of future results. But past performance can be, and an axiom in NFL personnel rooms is, look at the film.
 
CSNChicago.com is doing that as the NFL Scouting Combine approaches (Feb. 29) along with free agency and the start of the league year and its trading window. It becomes an increasingly relevant exercise to look at the intricacies behind some of the key players and positions the Bears will be addressing through the upcoming weeks. CSNChicago.com previously looked at the need to evaluate quarterbacks from the intangible standpoints first, then the measurables.
 
Using Jay Cutler as an object lesson for how immense physical skills have questionable correlations to immense NFL performance, a look at one aspect of quarterback "film" warrants more attention than the measurables that command a disproportionate share of attention and scrutiny.
 
Ball security.
 
It has been Cutler's single biggest issue through his eight Bears seasons, was a reason why coaches once wanted to stay with Josh McCown instead of returning to Cutler following a Cutler injury absence, and why Brian Hoyer played his way into prominence in the discussion of 2017 Bears plans. Adam Gase went from offensive coordinator to hottest head-coach prospect in no small measure because he managed Cutler into better ball security.

[SHOP: Get your Bears gear right here]
 
But the point here is less Cutler – expected to be traded or released within the near future – than the level of ball security in the available options beyond Hoyer.
 
So, look at the film:
 
The widespread drooling over a possible trade with New England for Jimmy Garoppolo. The best thing in Garoppolo's favor is that he has been a Patriots backup to Tom Brady. Garoppolo, drawing distant comparisons to a Matt Flynn, Matt Cassel and other past experience-lite quarterback options, has thrown 94 NFL passes without an interception, which is impressive until matched against Hoyer's 200 last season without an interception, for comparison purposes.
 
But evaluating Garoppolo against the coming chief draft competition – DeShone Kizer, Mitch Trubisky, Deshaun Watson – suggests comparing apples to apples, meaning college ball security, since that's all the kids have to this point.
 
Garoppolo vaulted up draft boards (to New England's second round) on the strength of an Eastern Illinois senior season with 53 touchdown passes vs. nine interceptions, against chiefly FCS opposition. But in his first three seasons Garoppolo threw for 65 touchdowns and was intercepted 42 times.
 
Kizer? In his two Notre Dame seasons, 47 touchdowns, 19 interceptions.
 
Trubisky? 30 touchdowns last season, six interceptions. Including his two years as a North Carolina backup, 41 touchdowns, 10 interceptions.
 
Watson? 90 touchdowns, 32 interceptions in three Clemson seasons, the last two as Tigers starter.
 
Observations:
 
Garoppolo put in four college seasons, but has a little of the Trubisky/Flynn/Cassel, one-year-wonder feel. 
 
Kizer and Watson have more starting seasons, but the Watson intangible of getting his team to two national-championship games speaks to another level of "intangible."
 
GM Ryan Pace will incorporate heavy input from coach John Fox and coordinator Dowell Loggains. Coaches love ball security. Garoppolo? Watson? Trubisky? Kizer?
 
Look at the film.

BearsTalk Podcast: The risk and reward for Bears in trading for Jimmy Garoppolo

jimmy-g-216.jpg
USA TODAY

BearsTalk Podcast: The risk and reward for Bears in trading for Jimmy Garoppolo

In this edition of the BearsTalk podcast, CSN's Chris Boden, Sun-Times Bears beat writer Patrick Finley, and CSNChicago.com's Scott Krinch discuss the Bears' approach to the two-week window opening to franchise-tag Alshon Jeffery again, the risk/reward in trading for Jimmy Garoppolo or drafting a QB (and how high to draft one), Scott's 2.0 mock draft, plus the workers' compensation controversy the team found itself in last week and the club's decision to raise ticket prices.

Listen to the full episode at this link or in the embedded player below: