Random News of the Day: Punt it away

230090.jpg

Random News of the Day: Punt it away

Thursday, Aug. 12, 2010
12:32 PM

By Joe Collins
CSNChicago.com

The lead up to football season kind of reminds me of those chocolate calendars that circulate around the holidays. Anybody ever see those things? As a kid, I remember that I would open up the December 1 tab, and it would always have a ridiculous eyedrop-sized piece of chocolate. And it was usually stale. But hey, it was still chocolate. Day by day, the chocolates would get bigger. The Super Bowl of that chocolate calendar would be opened on December 24th. It was usually a bulky, warped, half dollar-sized chocolate Santa Claus, which looked more like David Crosby than Kris Kringle. It was still stale, but given the fanfare around the holiday it tasted pretty good.

Football training camp would be tantamount to, say, the first week of December of that calendar. We get a little taste of what lies ahead in the preseason, regular season, playoffs and all of the sweetness that makes up the Super Bowl. And even though the chocolate still tastes stale at times, we still eat it up like were at a Vegas buffet. Certain parts of the NFL have become stale, too. I dont want to rock the boat too much, because a bad day with football is usually much better than a good day without it. But there are a few items in the NFL that are facing 4th and long. Its time to drop back and punt a few of these annoyances away:

Just Get Rid Of Two Preseason Games Already: As we know, each team gets four preseason gamesusually two on the road and two at home (or one at a neutral site). NFL commissioner Roger Goodell has already gone on the record in favor of the 18-game schedule, saying by taking one of the home preseason games and converting it into a regular season, youre improving the quality of what youre doing. Thats value. Some critics oppose, saying that an 18-game schedule could open the door to more player injuries and a diminished product later in the year. Pssh. Come on. With all of the new rules, like no horse-collar tackles and other rules that protect the quarterback, I dont buy the injury argument. Players are treated like glass dolls today. Come on, this is football. An 18-game schedule would bring more fan interest, increased ratings, and thus, more moneysomething that the NFL likes to make out with all the time. Get it done.Do What College Football Does About Overtime: We all know that football revolves around big TV ratings, big dollars and big hype. Why not take a page out of college footballs scrapbook and put their overtime procedures in place for the NFL? Each team gets a possession at the 25 yard line. You keep going until one team scores more on their possession than the other. Imagine the hysteria on a Bears-Packers game that is in the 4th OT with the score tied at 55. Heck, you would even draw in the figure skating viewers from other networks. Plus, it eliminates the clammy tie games that gunk up the playoff scenarios towards the end of the season. Stop Giving Raiders-Chiefs Games To Gus Johnson: Im not exactly sure why CBS puts Gus Johnson, one of the most exciting voices in sports, on the fourth-tiered (or lower) game of the week. Seeing Gus Johnson broadcast a game between a couple of 3-10 teams is like listening to a Master Of Puppets-era Metallica play in a mall food court. Sure, its still Metallica, but everything else around it just reeks of bad cheddar. Forget network seniority. Give this man the microphone in a game that means something. Wait, now that I think about it, Gus can make a Raiders-Chiefs game sound like the Super Bowl hopped up on Jolt Cola. Might have to rethink that one a little.Give Coaches A Pulse: The NFL is great, but its getting way too Wal-Mart-like: too much sterility, not enough personality. End zone celebrations are penalized, taunting is penalized and cookie-cutter, cyborg-like personalities are welcomed. And damage control is a core class in the NFL school of higher learning. The majority of NFL head coaches today are far too sensitive in their appearance and demeanor, especially in press conferences. Everything is squeaky clean and by the book. Just once, I would like to see a coach go on a postgame tirade and start throwing chairs like its a Maury Povich show. Then, the camera can follow the coach away from the podium for a during the break reaction. Fun! Best of all, promise the coach that he doesnt have to produce a mundane, forced apology the next day. Wouldnt that be a nice change of pace?The Pro Bowl: Footballs version of an all-star game is like Thanksgiving at your Aunt Sylvias. The sly ones that arent there turned in their get-out-of-jail-free cards weeks in advance. And the ones that are there are mailing it in more than the U.S. Postal Service. We all go through the motions in fake-liking holiday parties. The athletes in the Pro Bowl are no different. But can you blame them? This game is played by junior high football rules (no blitzing, etc). And putting the contest a week before the Super Bowl isnt going to help draw much more interestfrom players and fans alike. Heres a crazy idea: put the Pro Bowl on the same day of the Super Bowl, with the winning Pro Bowl team securing the coin-toss win for their representative team in the Super Bowl. Think about it, your Super Bowl pregame show loses the sappy 11-minute feature stories and gets legitimate interest. Only issue would be that if the site happened to be an outdoor facility, and it were to rain, the field would get ripped to shreds for the real game hours later. Orjust get rid of the Pro Bowl entirely.Look, the NFL is still 98 fun to me. But Piniella-isms aside, a few changes can make the league even sweeter.

It might even taste as good as that chocolate at the end of December. Especially if the Bears win a few games here and there.

Or something like that.

CSN Chicago experts predict how first round of 2017 NFL Draft will play out

CSN Chicago experts predict how first round of 2017 NFL Draft will play out

On the eve of the 2017 NFL Draft, our panel of CSN Chicago Bears contributors' John 'Moon' Mullin, Chris Boden, JJ Stankevitz and Scott Krinch make their final attempt at predicting the first round of the draft.

Check out each selection below and visit all over NFL Draft coverage here.

PICK/TEAM  MOON  BODEN  STANKEVITZ  KRINCH
1. Browns  Myles Garrett  Mitchell Trubisky  Myles Garrett  Myles Garrett
2. 49ers  Solomon Thomas  Myles Garrett  Solomon Thomas  Leonard Fournette
3. Bears  Deshaun Watson  Jamal Adams  Deshaun Watson  Solomon  Thomas
4. Jaguars  Jonathan Allen  O.J. Howard  Leonard Fournette  Mitchell Trubisky
5. Titans  Jamal Adams  Marshon Lattimore Garon Conley  Jamal Adams
6. Jets  Marshon Lattimore  Mike Williams  O.J. Howard  O.J. Howard
7, Chargers  Mike Williams  Malik Hooker  Malik Hooker  Malik Hooker
8. Panthers  Leonard Fournette  Leonard Fournette  Jonathan Allen  Christian McCaffrey
9. Bengals  Gareon Conley  Solomon Thomas  Derek Barnett  Haason Reddick
10. Bills  Malik Hooker  Reuben Foster  Mike Williams  Jonathan Allen
11. Saints  O.J. Howard  Derek Barnett  Jamal Adams  Marshon Lattimore
12. Browns  Mitchell Trubisky  Jonathan Allen  Mitchell Trubisky  Deshaun Watson
13. Cardinals  Patrick Mahomes  Patrick Mahomes  Marshon Lattimore  Patrick Mahomes
14. Eagles  Christian McCaffrey  Christian McCaffrey  Christian McCaffrey  Derek Barnett
15. Colts  Takkarist McKinley  Charles Harris  Garett Bolles  Charles Harris
16. Ravens  Reuben Foster  Corey Davis  Haason Reddick  Mike Williams
17. Redskins  Haason Reddick  Haason Reddick  Forrest Lamp  Reuben Foster
18. Titans  Corey Davis  John Ross  Reuben Foster  Forrest Lamp
19. Buccaneers  Cam Robinson  Taco Charlton  Dalvin Cook  Dalvin Cook
20. Broncos  Ryan Ramczyk  Ryan Ramczyk  Charles Harris  Garett Bolles
21. Lions  Jarrad Davis  Jarrad Davis  Corey Davis  Takkarist McKinley
22. Dolphins  David Njoku  Quincy Wilson  Kevin King  David Njoku
23. Giants  Garett Bolles  David Njoku  Patrick Mahomes  Ryan Ramczyk
24. Raiders  Kevin King  Tim Williams  Malik McDowell  Chidobe Awuzie
25. Texans  DeShone Kizer  Deshaun Watson  Jarrad Davis  Cam Robinson
26. Seahawks  Jabrill Peppers  Garett Bolles  Chidobe Awuzie  Kevin King
27. Chiefs  Dalvin Cook  Malik McDowell  DeShone Kizer  Corey Davis
28. Cowboys  Caleb Brantley  Jabrill Peppers  Chris Wormley  Malik McDowell
29. Packers  Forrest Lamp  Dalvin Cook  Taylor Moton  Joe Mixon
30. Steelers  John Ross  Takkarist McKinley  John Ross  Adoree' Jackson
31. Falcons  Charles Harris  Demarcus Walker  Derek Rivers  Taco Charlton
32. Saints  Budda Baker  Curtis Samuel  Tre'Davious White  Marlon Humphrey

Ryan Pace focusing on 'best player available,' at No. 3: Could that be Deshaun Watson?

Ryan Pace focusing on 'best player available,' at No. 3: Could that be Deshaun Watson?

Last month, Ryan Pace described his day-before-the-draft press conference as being one of the “hardest” he does all year.

With only a little over 24 hours until the Bears go on the clock with the third overall pick in the NFL Draft, the third-year Bears general manager wasn’t tipping his hand while answering the media’s questions on Wednesday.

One of Pace’s overarching points, though, was that the Bears have to focus on taking the best player available at No. 3 Thursday night. Pace said the Bears have three players targeted for that spot, and what the Cleveland Browns or San Francisco 49ers do ahead of them won’t impact their decision.

What also won’t impact the Bears’ decision is the need to draft a quarterback.

“I think you get yourself into trouble if you’re not sticking with our philosophy of best player available,” Pace said. “When you start trying to manufacture things or create things, that’s when teams get into dangerous water. I think if we just stay with guys we have a consensus on and best player available we’ll be in good shape.”

Plenty of draft observers — ESPN’s Mel Kiper, Rotoworld’s Josh Norris, NFL Network’s Mike Manock, CBS Sports’ Rob Rang — don’t have a quarterback in the top three of their respective “big boards,” which are headlined by the likes of Texas A&M edge rusher Myles Garrett, LSU safety Jamal Adams, Stanford defensive end Solomon Thomas and/or Alabama’s Jonathan Allen, among a few others.

But what if the Bears’ consensus is that a quarterback is a top-three player?

Over the last few months, Pace has consistently touted intangibles as being of prominent importance when evaluating a quarterback. At the combine in Indianapolis, he pointed to Drew Brees taking Purdue — a perennial Big Ten bottom-feeder — to a Rose Bowl. Pace, of course, knows Brees’ NFL success well having watched him in New Orleans before becoming the Bears’ general manager. 

[VIVID SEATS: Get your Bears tickets right here!]

There’s one quarterback in this year’s draft class that could have those intangibles to be considered at No. 3: Clemson’s Deshaun Watson. 

Before Watson took over as a full-time starter in 2015, Clemson established itself as a perennial Orange Bowl contender that’d win 10 or 11 games a year. But Watson took Clemson to a different level, going 28-2 and reaching the College Football Playoff title game in 2015 (a loss to Alabama) and 2016 (a win over Alabama). 

“It's big with every position, the intangibles,” Pace said. ‘That's what I continue to stress to our guys right now, because you can get enamored with these physical qualities or these traits. There's enough good players where we don't need to change our standards.

“I really like our locker room right now. I really like the vibe right now in that locker room with the guys that we have here, it feels good, and I want to continue to add to that vibe and add to that excitement. It's up to me to impress that to our scouts and to our coaches that, hey, we've got to make sure we're adding the right kinds of guys, the right kinds of intangibles to our room.”

If Watson isn’t among the team’s consensus top three, he could fit into one of the “clouds” Pace talked about if the Bears trade down into the middle or later part of the first round. But trading down (or back into the first round) carries risk if the Bears believe Watson could be a franchise-changing quarterback. The No. 3 pick is the highest the Bears have had since the early 1970s, and it’s a position the team hardly wants to be in again.

Pace, of course, wasn’t going to reveal much the day before he and the Bears make a critically-important selection. The Bears know who they want, and Thursday night, so will everyone else.

“There’s been so much that’s come into this since August, so you’ve just trust what your eyes see and don’t over-think it,” Pace said. “Trust your conviction and trust your instincts and trust your gut.

“You can get into trouble right now if you’re up there watching additional tape and doing all that; I think you can over-scout players. By now we’ve got enough opinions. We’ve met with enough players. We’ve been through the Combine and been through the Pro Days and seen players play live. At this point we feel good. I don’t think we’re in a situation where we’re overthinking anything.”