Trotter: NFL won't expand season to 18 games

Trotter: NFL won't expand season to 18 games

Wednesday, March 9, 2011
Posted: 6:57 p.m. Updated: 7:37 p.m.

By John Mullin
CSNChicago.com

Good friend Jim Trotter of Sports Illustrated got a moment with NFLPA President Demaurice Smith late Wednesday and it does look like there wont be an 18-game NFL season anytime soon (http:tinyurl.com4j9cc7d).

That means rosters and schedules and myriad other details wont have to be adjusted, at least at this point.

Indeed, nothing is done til its done and hard information has been difficult to come by with the NFL and NFLPA adhering surprisingly well to their vow of silence over the past couple weeks. But indications are that some progress is being made, although substantive issues are still a long way from resolved, and those may be deal-killers.

National Football Posts Andrew Brandt does a great job of laying out the proposals for capping rookie salaries, fittingly titled The Rookie Sacrifice (http:tinyurl.com4d78mv3). Its something which both sides and most of the football public agree have spiraled out of control vs. the success rate of high draft choices, for instance.

Andrew, who negotiated contracts while a member of the Green Bay Packers front office, offers a compromise package of his own which includes splitting the mandatory contract lengths for the 32 first-round picks. Not sure how this will play with players agents, but right now they are the only ones really pushing hard for the yet-to-be players.

These ideas havent been finalized by any means. But getting a look at some of the proposals on the table, literally, as well as the kind of compromise that could effect some movement, is revealing.

Revealing is the problem, however. The players remain insistent that the owners open their books to wider scrutiny as a way to buttress claims that their profits need the 1 billion kick-in they are demanding that the players make. And the owners, whether for competitive reasons among themselves or whatever, dont see that issue as discussable.

The way out of that stalemate, as Ive alluded to previously, may be the independent verifier mechanism that the league has had for checking validity of contract claims in free agency. An independent auditor has been selected by the players to review books in confidence but whether that works for the owners still is unresolved.

Thursday and Friday are expected to be heavy negotiation days, with another extension not out of the realm of possibility. At least theyre still talking.

John "Moon" Mullin is CSNChicago.com's Bears Insider, and appears regularly on Bears Postgame Live and Chicago Tribune Live. Follow Moon on Twitter for up-to-the-minute Bears information.

Want to be in on Bears QB deliberations? 'Look at the film'

Want to be in on Bears QB deliberations? 'Look at the film'

Back in 1992 the Dallas Cowboys were in draft deliberations around the No. 17 spot of the first round, looking for upgrades on defense. A scout made a suggestion that they target Ohio State defensive end Alonzo Spellman, one of the most physically imposing (6-4, 280 pounds) players and best athletes in that draft.
 
Coach Jimmy Johnson responded, "Tell me about the production."
 
Came back the answer: Three years at OSU, nine total sacks.
 
"Oh, please!" Johnson scoffed, calling in cornerback Kevin Smith and leaving Spellman to the Bears at No. 22. Spellman had several respectable seasons but never more than 8.5 sacks in nine NFL seasons.
 
As investment advisers counsel, past performance is not necessarily a predictor of future results. But past performance can be, and an axiom in NFL personnel rooms is, look at the film.
 
CSNChicago.com is doing that as the NFL Scouting Combine approaches (Feb. 29) along with free agency and the start of the league year and its trading window. It becomes an increasingly relevant exercise to look at the intricacies behind some of the key players and positions the Bears will be addressing through the upcoming weeks. CSNChicago.com previously looked at the need to evaluate quarterbacks from the intangible standpoints first, then the measurables.
 
Using Jay Cutler as an object lesson for how immense physical skills have questionable correlations to immense NFL performance, a look at one aspect of quarterback "film" warrants more attention than the measurables that command a disproportionate share of attention and scrutiny.
 
Ball security.
 
It has been Cutler's single biggest issue through his eight Bears seasons, was a reason why coaches once wanted to stay with Josh McCown instead of returning to Cutler following a Cutler injury absence, and why Brian Hoyer played his way into prominence in the discussion of 2017 Bears plans. Adam Gase went from offensive coordinator to hottest head-coach prospect in no small measure because he managed Cutler into better ball security.

[SHOP: Get your Bears gear right here]
 
But the point here is less Cutler – expected to be traded or released within the near future – than the level of ball security in the available options beyond Hoyer.
 
So, look at the film:
 
The widespread drooling over a possible trade with New England for Jimmy Garoppolo. The best thing in Garoppolo's favor is that he has been a Patriots backup to Tom Brady. Garoppolo, drawing distant comparisons to a Matt Flynn, Matt Cassel and other past experience-lite quarterback options, has thrown 94 NFL passes without an interception, which is impressive until matched against Hoyer's 200 last season without an interception, for comparison purposes.
 
But evaluating Garoppolo against the coming chief draft competition – DeShone Kizer, Mitch Trubisky, Deshaun Watson – suggests comparing apples to apples, meaning college ball security, since that's all the kids have to this point.
 
Garoppolo vaulted up draft boards (to New England's second round) on the strength of an Eastern Illinois senior season with 53 touchdown passes vs. nine interceptions, against chiefly FCS opposition. But in his first three seasons Garoppolo threw for 65 touchdowns and was intercepted 42 times.
 
Kizer? In his two Notre Dame seasons, 47 touchdowns, 19 interceptions.
 
Trubisky? 30 touchdowns last season, six interceptions. Including his two years as a North Carolina backup, 41 touchdowns, 10 interceptions.
 
Watson? 90 touchdowns, 32 interceptions in three Clemson seasons, the last two as Tigers starter.
 
Observations:
 
Garoppolo put in four college seasons, but has a little of the Trubisky/Flynn/Cassel, one-year-wonder feel. 
 
Kizer and Watson have more starting seasons, but the Watson intangible of getting his team to two national-championship games speaks to another level of "intangible."
 
GM Ryan Pace will incorporate heavy input from coach John Fox and coordinator Dowell Loggains. Coaches love ball security. Garoppolo? Watson? Trubisky? Kizer?
 
Look at the film.

BearsTalk Podcast: The risk and reward for Bears in trading for Jimmy Garoppolo

jimmy-g-216.jpg
USA TODAY

BearsTalk Podcast: The risk and reward for Bears in trading for Jimmy Garoppolo

In this edition of the BearsTalk podcast, CSN's Chris Boden, Sun-Times Bears beat writer Patrick Finley, and CSNChicago.com's Scott Krinch discuss the Bears' approach to the two-week window opening to franchise-tag Alshon Jeffery again, the risk/reward in trading for Jimmy Garoppolo or drafting a QB (and how high to draft one), Scott's 2.0 mock draft, plus the workers' compensation controversy the team found itself in last week and the club's decision to raise ticket prices.

Listen to the full episode at this link or in the embedded player below: