Cubs not a good fit for Pujols, Fielder

598326.png

Cubs not a good fit for Pujols, Fielder

Everybody is clamoring for the Cubs to sign Prince Fielder or Albert Pujols this offseason. The logic makes sense: The Cubs need to improve, have a wide open first base position and these are two MVP-caliber players. Oh yeah, and the Cubs have a ton of money.

But the last part is a bit false. They don't have that much money, largely because of the albatross contracts of Alfonso Soriano, Carlos Zambrano and even Ryan Dempster's 14 million.

Plus, one guy won't suddenly make the Cubs a playoff team, even if that guy is Pujols.

ESPN's Buster Olney concurs, tweeting Sunday:

embedly_twitter_77869802background:url(http:a3.twimg.comprofile_background_images146607075busterback2.jpg) 131516; padding:20px; embedly_twitter_77869802 pbackground:fff;padding:10px 12px 0px 12px;margin:0;min-height:48px;color:000;font-size:18px;line-height:22px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px embedly_twitter_77869802 .embedly_tweet_contentbackground:fff;padding:10px 12px 10px 12px;margin:0;min-height:48px;color:000;font-size:18px !important;line-height:22px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px embedly_twitter_77869802 p span.metadatadisplay:block;width:100;clear:both;margin-top:0px;height:40px; padding-bottom: 12px; embedly_twitter_77869802 p span.metadata span.authorline-height:15px;color:999;font-size:14px embedly_twitter_77869802 p span.metadata span.author aline-height:15px;font-size:20px;vertical-align:middle embedly_twitter_77869802 p span.metadata span.author imgfloat:left;margin:0 10px 0 0px;width:48px;height:48px embedly_twitter_77869802 p a color: 009999; text-decoration:none; embedly_twitter_77869802 p a:hovertext-decoration:underline embedly_twitter_77869802 .embedly_timestampfont-size:13px;display:inline-block;margin-top: 5px; embedly_twitter_77869802 .components-above span.embedly_timestampfont-size:10px;margin-top: 1px;line-height:12px embedly_twitter_77869802 a color: 009999; text-decoration:none; embedly_twitter_77869802 a:hovertext-decoration:underline embedly_twitter_77869802 .tweet-screen-name font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; embedly_twitter_77869802 .tweet-full-name padding-left: 4px; color: 999; font-size: 12px; embedly_twitter_77869802 .tweet-actionsmargin-left: 10px;font-size:13px;display:inline-block;width:250px embedly_twitter_77869802 .components-above span.tweet-actionsfont-size:10px embedly_twitter_77869802 .controlsline-height:12px!important embedly_twitter_77869802 .tweet-actions a margin-left:5px embedly_twitter_77869802 .tweet-actions a bfont-weight:normal embedly_twitter_77869802 .components-above span.tweet-actions a bvertical-align:baseline;line-height:12px embedly_twitter_77869802 .components-above .tweet-textfont-size:13px;vertical-align:baseline embedly_twitter_77869802 .tweet-image float: left; width: 40px; embedly_twitter_77869802 .tweet-user-block-image float: left; width: 48px; height: 48px embedly_twitter_77869802 .tweet-row margin-left: 40px; margin-top: 3px;line-height: 17px; embedly_twitter_77869802 .tweet-user-block margin-left: -40px; embedly_twitter_77869802 .stream-item padding-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 12px; embedly_twitter_77869802 .simple-tweet-image img margin-top: 4px; embedly_twitter_77869802 .simple-tweet-content margin: 0 0 13px 0px; font-size: 14px; min-height:48px; embedly_twitter_77869802 .in-reply-to-border border-color: EBEBEB; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 0 0; embedly_twitter_77869802 .in-reply-to-text margin-left: 4px; padding-left: 8px; padding-right: 10px; color: 999; font-size: 12px; embedly_twitter_77869802 .tweet-actions i background: transparent url(http:a2.twimg.coma1306889658phoeniximgsprite-icons.png) no-repeat;width:15px;height:15px;margin:0 4px -3px 3px;outline: none; text-indent:-99999px;vertical-align:baseline;display:inline-block;position:relative; embedly_twitter_77869802 .tweet-actions a.retweet-action i background-position:-192px 0; embedly_twitter_77869802 .tweet-actions a.reply-action i background-position:0 0; embedly_twitter_77869802 .tweet-actions a.favorite-action i background-position:-32px 0; @Buster_ESPN
Buster OlneyAnd neither Pujols nor Fielder is a perfect 1B long-term target for the Cubs -- Pujols because of his age, Fielder because of defense.
Nov 27 via webFavoriteRetweetReply

That's exactly the point. Even if Pujols is only 31 and his age was never doctored (a rumor I won't even touch on besides this mention), he's looking for a megadeal and the Cubs' new front office doesn't want to tie themselves down with a contract that will be paying a 40-year-old 23 million.

At four years younger, Fielder seems to be a safer option for a long-term contract. He would still be in his prime (at age 33) roughly six years into the deal. But even in the midst of his prime right now, he's a below-average fielder (despite his name) and will only lose range and possibly gain weight (given his body type) as he ages.

Olney makes the point that Fielder would be a better fit on an AL team where he could sign a 10-year deal and spend the last three or four years serving primarily as the designated hitter:

embedly_twitter_33800860background:url(http:a3.twimg.comprofile_background_images146607075busterback2.jpg) 131516; padding:20px; embedly_twitter_33800860 pbackground:fff;padding:10px 12px 0px 12px;margin:0;min-height:48px;color:000;font-size:18px;line-height:22px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px embedly_twitter_33800860 .embedly_tweet_contentbackground:fff;padding:10px 12px 10px 12px;margin:0;min-height:48px;color:000;font-size:18px !important;line-height:22px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px embedly_twitter_33800860 p span.metadatadisplay:block;width:100;clear:both;margin-top:0px;height:40px; padding-bottom: 12px; embedly_twitter_33800860 p span.metadata span.authorline-height:15px;color:999;font-size:14px embedly_twitter_33800860 p span.metadata span.author aline-height:15px;font-size:20px;vertical-align:middle embedly_twitter_33800860 p span.metadata span.author imgfloat:left;margin:0 10px 0 0px;width:48px;height:48px embedly_twitter_33800860 p a color: 009999; text-decoration:none; embedly_twitter_33800860 p a:hovertext-decoration:underline embedly_twitter_33800860 .embedly_timestampfont-size:13px;display:inline-block;margin-top: 5px; embedly_twitter_33800860 .components-above span.embedly_timestampfont-size:10px;margin-top: 1px;line-height:12px embedly_twitter_33800860 a color: 009999; text-decoration:none; embedly_twitter_33800860 a:hovertext-decoration:underline embedly_twitter_33800860 .tweet-screen-name font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; embedly_twitter_33800860 .tweet-full-name padding-left: 4px; color: 999; font-size: 12px; embedly_twitter_33800860 .tweet-actionsmargin-left: 10px;font-size:13px;display:inline-block;width:250px embedly_twitter_33800860 .components-above span.tweet-actionsfont-size:10px embedly_twitter_33800860 .controlsline-height:12px!important embedly_twitter_33800860 .tweet-actions a margin-left:5px embedly_twitter_33800860 .tweet-actions a bfont-weight:normal embedly_twitter_33800860 .components-above span.tweet-actions a bvertical-align:baseline;line-height:12px embedly_twitter_33800860 .components-above .tweet-textfont-size:13px;vertical-align:baseline embedly_twitter_33800860 .tweet-image float: left; width: 40px; embedly_twitter_33800860 .tweet-user-block-image float: left; width: 48px; height: 48px embedly_twitter_33800860 .tweet-row margin-left: 40px; margin-top: 3px;line-height: 17px; embedly_twitter_33800860 .tweet-user-block margin-left: -40px; embedly_twitter_33800860 .stream-item padding-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 12px; embedly_twitter_33800860 .simple-tweet-image img margin-top: 4px; embedly_twitter_33800860 .simple-tweet-content margin: 0 0 13px 0px; font-size: 14px; min-height:48px; embedly_twitter_33800860 .in-reply-to-border border-color: EBEBEB; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 0 0; embedly_twitter_33800860 .in-reply-to-text margin-left: 4px; padding-left: 8px; padding-right: 10px; color: 999; font-size: 12px; embedly_twitter_33800860 .tweet-actions i background: transparent url(http:a2.twimg.coma1306889658phoeniximgsprite-icons.png) no-repeat;width:15px;height:15px;margin:0 4px -3px 3px;outline: none; text-indent:-99999px;vertical-align:baseline;display:inline-block;position:relative; embedly_twitter_33800860 .tweet-actions a.retweet-action i background-position:-192px 0; embedly_twitter_33800860 .tweet-actions a.reply-action i background-position:0 0; embedly_twitter_33800860 .tweet-actions a.favorite-action i background-position:-32px 0; @Buster_ESPN
Buster OlneyAn AL team would be best-suited to be really aggressive on Prince Fielder, because it could project him as a DH at end of contract
Nov 27 via webFavoriteRetweetReply

But what AL team would be the best fit?

Report: Cubs preparing to roll the dice with Brett Anderson

Report: Cubs preparing to roll the dice with Brett Anderson

The Cubs are preparing to roll the dice with Brett Anderson, hoping the talented, frequently injured pitcher can stay healthy and provide insurance for their rotation.

Anderson posted a telling message on his Twitter account on Monday night, hinting at what would be another offseason check mark for the defending World Series champs.

The physical for the agreement — first reported by Ken Rosenthal of Fox Sports and MLB Network — won't just be a formality as Anderson underwent back surgery last March and appeared in only four games for the Los Angeles Dodgers last season.

But Anderson fits on paper as a left-hander who will turn only 29 on Feb. 1 and won't have to carry front-of-the-rotation responsibilities or feel Opening Day urgency on a team with five projected starters.

The Cubs had been willing to gamble around $6 million on Tyson Ross, who recently signed a similarly structured one-year deal with the Texas Rangers as he recovers from surgery to address thoracic outlet syndrome.

The calculus would essentially be the same with Anderson. The Cubs have to factor in last year's grueling playoff run into early November, this season's sky-high expectations, the organization's lack of high-end, upper-level pitching prospects and the uncertainty surrounding the 2018 rotation.

[SHOP CUBS: Get your Cubs gear right here]

Anderson finished sixth in the 2009 American League Rookie of the Year voting with the Oakland A's, but he's reached the 30-start mark only one other time and never accounted for 200 innings in a single season.

Anderson underwent Tommy John surgery in the middle of the 2011 season, and the injuries piled up from there, dealing with a strained right oblique, a stress fracture in his right foot and a broken left index finger.

Anderson had such a fragile reputation that he accepted the one-year, $15.8 million qualifying offer from the Dodgers after a strong platform year in 2015 (10-9, 3.69 ERA). The Dodgers only got 11 1/3 innings out of Anderson, who didn't pitch during a playoff run that ended at Wrigley Field in the National League Championship Series.

The Cubs stayed exceptionally healthy while winning 200 games across the last two seasons and need to be prepared in case John Lackey sharply declines at the age of 38 or Mike Montgomery experiences growing pains while transitioning from the bullpen.

Whether or not Anderson is ultimately the answer, the Cubs will be looking to place a sixth starter into their plans.

"I don't know if a six-man rotation on a permanent basis is the wave of the future," team president Theo Epstein said earlier this winter. "But we certainly endorse it on a temporary basis as a nice way to pace guys for the whole season.

"We can get them some rest, whether you do it in April to preserve depth and ease guys into the season, especially after a deep October and November run. Or after the All-Star break in the summer to kind of get through the dog days and give guys a little bit of a breather as you ramp up for the stretch run.

"I think it would be tough to pull off all season long. But it's something that (could certainly work) in the right spot."

Report: Cubs have a deal with free-agent starting pitcher Brett Anderson

Report: Cubs have a deal with free-agent starting pitcher Brett Anderson

The Cubs are reportedly adding another pitcher to their 2017 mix.

According to Fox Sports' Ken Rosenthal, the Cubs have agreed to a deal with veteran left-hander Brett Anderson.

[SHOP CUBS: Get your Cubs gear right here]

Anderson started his career with a bang back in 2009, starting 30 games and striking out 150 batters for the Oakland A's and finishing in the top 10 in American League Rookie of the Year voting. But while he pitched well in some of the years that followed, staying healthy has been a consistent challenge.

After making those 30 starts in 2009, he started 19 games in 2010, then 13 in 2011, then a total of just 19 over the next three seasons, the third coming with the Colorado Rockies.

He burst back onto the scene with 31 starts (and a 3.69 ERA) with the Los Angeles Dodgers in 2015. But last season with the Dodgers, he appeared in only four games, making just three starts.

All in all, Anderson has a 3.86 career ERA in 685 2/3 innings over 127 appearances, 115 of which have been starts.

While the Cubs' rotation is packed at the top with Cy Young contenders Jon Lester, Jake Arrieta and Kyle Hendricks — and John Lackey has the No. 4 spot nailed down — the fifth spot is a bit more of an uncertainty. Mike Montgomery figures to be the favorite, but perhaps Anderson could get himself into the mix.

Regardless, he's en route to the Windy City.